Tuesday, July 5, 2016

Teach the Breech Review of Day 2


Day 2 of Teach the Breech was just as exciting as Day 1


Dr. Anke Reitter shared her new pelvic measurement research which she brings to us in September in St. Paul, MN. Where is the pelvis larger when moms crouch?



Several stations with manikins and dolls allowed for hands on practice.




Dutch  Midwife Rebekka Visser spoke on the lack of a control group for breech birth.


 UK midwife Shawn Walker gave a brilliant talk on collaboration. She started with a humorous anecdote showing a brilliant insight to the culture of birth care. Her talk as well as her tweets are comprehensive, insightful and academically satisfying. 



Betty-Anne Daviss and Ken Johnson spoke on the statistics and dynamics of research. These two crossed the ocean of differences between OB and midwifery breech care to increase safety in both by doing the data crunching for the Frankfurt breech research.  This study, I believe, is the key to safe breech birth on earth. This is where we go to open the birthing rooms to breech birthing families in hospitals and increase the safety of midwifery-led breech care in all settings.

What amount of training makes breech safer? 


Frank Louwen  teaches obstetricians from his University medical center as well as occasionalHe  visiting obstetricians from around the world. He says we must have better training and better methods  for breech birth that isn't dangerous. After showing us the upright breech birth statistics, he actually said, "Breech birth isn't dangerous."  It is more complicated than cephalic but statistically very justifiable.




Dr. Louwen points out that a provider is not competent until they can identify when breech is not progressing normally and have the solutions to return the baby to the position of progress. 

Dr. Louwen identified how to see when the breech baby was stuck and several safe, and simple ways to handle various complications of breech births. I've been using the identifiers and techniques he teaches and can say without a doubt that his teaching has saved half a dozen lives while making another half dozen more comfortable (figuring someone would have figured those easier degrees of obstruction out). This is information that North American midwives do not get in their training or traditions! It must be shared and understood to make breech practice approach a level of safety to safely offer labor care for selected women. 

Teach the Breech Review of Day 2


Day 2 of Teach the Breech was just as exciting as Day 1


Dr. Anke Reitter shared her new pelvic measurement research which she brings to us in September in St. Paul, MN. Where is the pelvis larger when moms crouch?



Several stations with manikins and dolls allowed for hands on practice.




Dutch  Midwife Rebekka Visser spoke on the lack of a control group for breech birth.


 UK midwife Shawn Walker gave a brilliant talk on collaboration. She started with a humorous anecdote showing a brilliant insight to the culture of birth care. Her talk as well as her tweets are comprehensive, insightful and academically satisfying. 



Betty-Anne Daviss and Ken Johnson spoke on the statistics and dynamics of research. These two crossed the ocean of differences between OB and midwifery breech care to increase safety in both by doing the data crunching for the Frankfurt breech research.  This study, I believe, is the key to safe breech birth on earth. This is where we go to open the birthing rooms to breech birthing families in hospitals and increase the safety of midwifery-led breech care in all settings.

What amount of training makes breech safer? 


Frank Louwen  teaches obstetricians from his University medical center as well as occasionalHe  visiting obstetricians from around the world. He says we must have better training and better methods  for breech birth that isn't dangerous. After showing us the upright breech birth statistics, he actually said, "Breech birth isn't dangerous."  It is more complicated than cephalic but statistically very justifiable.




Dr. Louwen points out that a provider is not competent until they can identify when breech is not progressing normally and have the solutions to return the baby to the position of progress. 

Dr. Louwen identified how to see when the breech baby was stuck and several safe, and simple ways to handle various complications of breech births. I've been using the identifiers and techniques he teaches and can say without a doubt that his teaching has saved half a dozen lives while making another half dozen more comfortable (figuring someone would have figured those easier degrees of obstruction out). This is information that North American midwives do not get in their training or traditions! It must be shared and understood to make breech practice approach a level of safety to safely offer labor care for selected women. 

Teach the Breech Review of Day 1


The Netherland's.... for decades the natural birth
hub which, for the world,  equated best practice with Holland. But today Dutch homebirth rates are less than 1 in 5, and the right to breech vaginal birth is threatened to follow the rest of the world's unthoughtful trend to extinction. 


Countries rush to follow the campaign to eliminate vaginal breech birth in favor of surgical birth of the breechling. The US is systematically involuting hand skills for technological dependency and so accepting a rising subsequent maternal death rate just as a politician postpones ecological enforcement and other high tax projects, like bridge replacement.  The US breech BIRTH rate is less than 3%, and the 97% breech cesarean rate is only as high as these fast little birthlings can be detected. These few just surprise us before surgery can begin. 

How are US Obstetricians to know normal breech when A.) Breech statistics reflect premature and poorly prepared providers and teams in their outcomes, and B.) The Term Breech Trial was conducted by centers that did not have already successful breech birth clinics. Experienced breech centers would not participate in a random control trial because it is a dangerous proposition for vaginal breech birth (Kotaska). 

To hold on to the Dutch quality of service, 50 Obstetricians joined nearly 200 Midwives from The Netherlands and around the world to affirm the value of achieving better breech skills. Even the phrase, "better vaginal breech skills" denotes a purpose subdued for some 45 years  - since the surge in cesarean sections made breech skills a lesson of medical history!




Teach the Breech Conference ignited an Amsterdam harbour warehouse with the contagious enthusiasm of the world's core breech experts. Their skill and confidence drew in highly skilled providers who understand the need to preserve knowledge about the 3-5% of births in which babies come pelvis first before their heads. 


Dr. Joris van der Poste, MD, PhD, Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam; Fedde Scheele, MD, PhD, Gynaecologist of Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam; and Ruth Evers, Midwives and Senior Trainer at Talmor, Amsterdam devised the conference and ran it with smooth professionalism. 

First on the stage was Dr. Frank Louwen, MD PhD, Gynaecologist at Universitatsklinickum, Frankfurt, Germany. There was a warm revelation of his family name being Dutch and pronounced much softer (loo-in, almost like loon) than in Germany (Lo-Ven), both quite different than the American mispronunciation, (Lou-When). He gave a rousing "Origin Story" of how his brain saw again a diagram of a breech delivery process called the Bracht Maneuver from upside down when to talk on the phone he circled his desk and glanced back at the open book from above the drawing. Revelation struck!

If the mother were on her hands and knees, the doctor wouldn't have to grip and pry the baby out! He knew handling the baby was the greatest risk to the baby. By the new view of breech, he suddenly had a solution to avoid the greatest risk to breech birth.

 In their study, no mothers died and only babies with lethal anomalies. The rate of interventions for hands and knees breech birth was lower than 1 in 5 compared to over 90% for breech birth on a woman's back.

Labors began when babies were term, frank or complete but not footling, clinical pelvimetry was normal or larger, and the mother desired vaginal breech birth. Labors were stopped and a cesarean was done if the baby didn't come down, if active labor stopped, or babies vitals were not good.

The anterior buttocks are born.
Upright breech 2nd stage was significantly shorter, with less perineal injury and remarkedly, Apgars less than 4 were only 3.1% compared to 10% with women on their back.

It's a paradigm shift. America is behind the times. Our question here, Is breech birth with an American Obstetrician or midwife more dangerous than cesarean breech delivery? Until we adapt the training of those obstetricians who conducted the PROMODA study approach to conventional breech birth or perhaps, better, the upright breech birth as in the "Frankfurt School" (not a building, but a method), then we shall not have a happy answer.    
Meanwhile, midwives have been attending breech and cephalic (head down) births in this way for millennia.  Betty-Anne Daviss, RM, MA, Adjunct Professor and Registered Midwife at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada gave her story of origin in how she learned about all-fours birth solutions from Guatemalan midwives in the 1970s.

Breech teaching skill- keep my hands out of the way and
still hold the pelvis steady!


Betty-Anne Daviss introduced the "Crowning Touch" single handed flexion of the stuck breech head. The audience was extremely moved by Betty-Anne's ingenious innovation.


After coffee, three Dutch obstetricians spoke on improving External Cephalic Version and the statistics. I missed any mention of risk, but that may have been because the topic sets me to replaying a horrific phone call following up a US breech mother who told me her baby passed away after a successful ECV - only to be told it was a tragic coincidence. It's a topic that I approach with caution to the point of cotton in my ears.


Favorable characteristics to successful breech flipping through ECV.
Dr.s Marjolein Kok, Joost Velzel and Midwife Mary Sheridan shared their effective success with manually turning breeches in both Amsterdam and London.

Eternal Cephalic Version, or ECV.

Yet, they also told the follow up statistics of what happens when the baby is manually turned. A higher rate of cesarean follows compared to other head down babies.




Not always favorable outcomes.
If you follow me on Spinning Babies, or have taken the workshop, you will know I believe that as many as 80% of breeches are breech for a reason of a misalignment of maternal anatomy "balance." This number could be lower, but it's a hefty percent. When we see the highest level of bodywork we see many of the breechings flipping spontaneously. That's my goal. I do hear from providers that when the mother puts the body balancing routine of the 3 Sisters and professional body work into the week preceding the ECV that either the ECV is no longer necessary or is easier than comparative ECVs. We need study on that, of course, but the anecdotal response is from multiple continents and practices.

Some of these cesareans may have been avoided if vaginal breech birth was supported with skilled providers. But many cesareans are avoided on the other hand. Options for what to do are necessary and needed to meet the needs of families and providers in all their variations.

These highly skilled practitioners were received with high regard for their compassionate and vital work. It's inspiring to be in the European academic community and see the high level of collaboration. This conference was a glowing example.


This picture is an hour before start.
I wish I could have shown you lunch!!








After lunch, this middle American middle-aged midwife presented a couple particularly perplexing breech births that became complicated and required on-the-spot innovation of technique. We can learn a formula for breech complication and we must. I highly recommend following the all-fours formula until you have resolved several cases of trapped arms and head. Then you will have in your hands a knowing that allows you to free the stuck breechling in other positions the mother may take. 

I don't believe we as providers should always follow the mother's choice. This is a provocative statement at first, but just explore for a moment what this can mean. In the water pool, the mother can not respond to the baby's head sliding past her pubic bone and clitoral ligament (get why she may move suddenly?) there in the same outlet opening way she can do when free movement is available on her living room floor or a firm hospital bed.  So she remains in an inlet closed position when on all-fours in the tub and you must improvise or get her out of the tub, the baby hanging by the atlas. In one video, I showed how I, similar to Betty-Anne, rotated the baby's head with my finger tips on the temporal bone when the mother remained in the birth tub in such a position that the baby floated out of flexion and lost vitality due to a delay in the birth. I brought the point around to that once you understand the principles and the three levels of the pelvis you can improvise. Then I showed my solution for freeing a small first twin's arm from the symphysis with an external maneuver which I will present in detail this September. 


Follow the formula until the inside of the woman's pelvis and every potential for the stuck breaching is as clear to you as "reaching into your sock drawer at midnight" and you will then be a safer provider when the unexpected happens in less accommodating maternal positions. Meanwhile the esteemed, highly trained professionals seemed a bit shocked and dismayed by the novice in the field. Yet, I showed this for exactly that point, that in North America there is little breech skill and with my small numbers, I am still one of but a handful of the most skilled breech providers in a 500-mile square radius.  I may proceed with duck tape and a prayer, but women have the right and will exercise their rights to vaginal breech birth with or without a skilled provider. One of the reasons is ideology and naiveté, if breech is normal, then why would one need a skilled breech provider? Normal means easy, doesn't it? 

After my own presentation it was lovely to hear Frank Louwen's admonishment that breech is not dangerous. Know the pathology and solve it as it may appear. Then you have the  level of safety that can restore breech skills to the world. But that talk was on Day 2, so wait for it.

Irene De Graaf, MD, PhD, Obstetrician at Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam creatively and humbly collaborated with famous Midwife, Rebekka Visser, Midwifery Practice Springtij, Usquert, in the north of Holland. 


Several Dutch obstetricians spoke with a freshness revealing their personal renewal to considering vaginal breech birth as a potential worth protecting and exploring.

Floorjte Vlemmix, MD, PhD, Resident O & G at Academic Meidcal Cnetre Amsterdam; Lester Befgenhenegouwen MD, PhD Gynaecologist at ZGT Hospitals, Almelo and Hengelo, The Netherlands; and perhaps my favorite presentation was given by Thomas van den Akker, MD, PhD, Resident O&G at University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands. He spoke of the widespread consequence of high resource countries promoting cesarean breech delivery on the maternal and infant death rates in low resource countries when they are not supported in vaginal breech birth and must switch to cesarean surgery in unfavorable conditions.

One slide revealed the rate of future siblings lost to save the first child. Dr. van den Akker shows that for every 10,000 cesareans done for breech position, 26 babies lives will be saved - but in subsequent pregnancies, 27 babies will die from complications relating back to that first cesarean.
Dr. Thomas worked in Malawi, a low resource country, which copies US obstetric protocol of doing cesareans for all breeches, yet in Malawi's compromised conditions. Another slide showed how many of their mothers die from cesarean in high and low resource countries. In Malawi, 6 women die per thousand cesareans done for breech.  Remember, these are comparing cesarean to breech birth on the back, which is not as safe for the child as when the mother is on all-fours and the cord is not cut.

 Having served an American middle class family who lost a mother to cesarean complications, the reality of his data is poignant in my mind.

Like the promotion of bottle feeding where clean water is not available, promoting surgery where electricity and hygiene, blood replacement and medications are scarce is assigning a death sentence to be like the American Jones, but also because the obstetricians with status can't even speak to breech skills for the, in this case, Malawi obstetricians for whom they are mentoring.

The horrendous effects of the ego in medicine are life threatening in as much as they innovate. So how to proceed? The process of the ego in accepting all-fours breech birth is diagramed by Irene De Graaft in the slide above: "No, Never! Impossible!"  to "I don't see any advantages; why is it better?" to "How can I learn/get enough experience?"  to awakening with a question, "What if...?"

An expert panel here moderated by the unflappable Ruth Evers modeled the route to better birth practice for breechlings and their welcoming families and providers. More soon, but now I must get the newsletter out!  



Teach the Breech Review of Day 1

The Netherland's.... for decades the natural birth
hub which, for the world,  equated best practice with Holland. But today Dutch homebirth rates are less than 1 in 5, and the right to breech vaginal birth is threatened to follow the rest of the world's unthoughtful trend to extinction. 


Countries rush to follow the campaign to eliminate vaginal breech birth in favor of surgical birth of the breechling. The US is systematically involuting hand skills for technological dependency and so accepting a rising subsequent maternal death rate just as a politician postpones ecological enforcement and other high tax projects, like bridge replacement.  The US breech BIRTH rate is less than 3%, and the 97% breech cesarean rate is only as high as these fast little birthlings can be detected. These few just surprise us before surgery can begin. 

How are US Obstetricians to know normal breech when A.) Breech statistics reflect premature and poorly prepared providers and teams in their outcomes, and B.) The Term Breech Trial was conducted by centers that did not have already successful breech birth clinics. Experienced breech centers would not participate in a random control trial because it is a dangerous proposition for vaginal breech birth (Kotaska). 

To hold on to the Dutch quality of service, 50 Obstetricians joined nearly 200 Midwives from The Netherlands and around the world to affirm the value of achieving better breech skills. Even the phrase, "better vaginal breech skills" denotes a purpose subdued for some 45 years  - since the surge in cesarean sections made breech skills a lesson of medical history!




Teach the Breech Conference ignited an Amsterdam harbour warehouse with the contagious enthusiasm of the world's core breech experts. Their skill and confidence drew in highly skilled providers who understand the need to preserve knowledge about the 3-5% of births in which babies come pelvis first before their heads. 















Dr. Joris van der Poste, MD, PhD, Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam; Fedde Scheele, MD, PhD, Gynaecologist of Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam; and Ruth Evers, Midwives and Senior Trainer at Talmor, Amsterdam devised the conference and ran it with smooth professionalism. 

First on the stage was Dr. Frank Louwen, MD PhD, Gynaecologist at Universitatsklinickum, Frankfurt, Germany. There was a warm revelation of his family name being Dutch and pronounced much softer (loo-in, almost like loon) than in Germany (Lo-Ven), both quite different than the American mispronunciation, (Lou-When). He gave a rousing "Origin Story" of how his brain saw again a diagram of a breech delivery process called the Bracht Maneuver from upside down when to talk on the phone he circled his desk and glanced back at the open book from above the drawing. Revelation struck!

If the mother were on her hands and knees, the doctor wouldn't have to grip and pry the baby out! He knew handling the baby was the greatest risk to the baby. By the new view of breech, he suddenly had a solution to avoid the greatest risk to breech birth.

 In their study, no mothers died and only babies with lethal anomalies. The rate of interventions for hands and knees breech birth was lower than 1 in 5 compared to over 90% for breech birth on a woman's back.

Labors began when babies were term, frank or complete but not footling, clinical pelvimetry was normal or larger, and the mother desired vaginal breech birth. Labors were stopped and a cesarean was done if the baby didn't come down, if active labor stopped, or babies vitals were not good.

Upright breech 2nd stage was significantly shorter, with less perineal injury and remarkedly, Apgars less than 4 were only 3.1% compared to 10% with women on their back.

It's a paradigm shift. America is behind the times. Our question here, Is breech birth with an American Obstetrician or midwife more dangerous than cesarean breech delivery? Until we adapt the training of those obstetricians who conducted the PROMODA study approach to conventional breech birth or perhaps, better, the upright breech birth as in the "Frankfurt School" (not a building, but a method), then we shall not have a happy answer.    

Meanwhile, midwives have been attending breech and cephalic (head down) births in this way for millennia.  Betty-Anne Daviss, RM, MA, Adjunct Professor and Registered Midwife at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada gave her story of origin in how she learned about all-fours birth solutions from Guatemalan midwives in the 1970s. 
She introduced the "Crowning Touch" single handed flexion of the stuck breech head. The audience was extremely moved by Betty-Anne's ingenious innovation.


After coffee, three Dutch obstetricians spoke on improving External Cephalic Version and the statistics. I missed any mention of risk, but that may have been because the topic sets me to replaying a horrific phone call following up a US breech mother who told me her baby passed away after a successful ECV - only to be told it was a tragic coincidence. It's a topic that I approach with caution to the point of cotton in my ears.


Favorable characteristics to successful breech flipping through ECV.
Dr.s Marjolein Kok, Joost Velzel and Midwife Mary Sheridan shared their effective success with manually turning breeches in both Amsterdam and London.

Eternal Cephalic Version, or ECV.

Yet, they also told the follow up statistics of what happens when the baby is manually turned. A higher rate of cesarean follows compared to other head down babies.




Not always favorable outcomes.
If you follow me on Spinning Babies, or have taken the workshop, you will know I believe that as many as 80% of breeches are breech for a reason of a misalignment of maternal anatomy "balance." This number could be lower, but it's a hefty percent. When we see the highest level of bodywork we see many of the breechings flipping spontaneously. That's my goal. I do hear from providers that when the mother puts the body balancing routine of the 3 Sisters and professional body work into the week preceding the ECV that either the ECV is no longer necessary or is easier than comparative ECVs. We need study on that, of course, but the anecdotal response is from multiple continents and practices.

Some of these cesareans may have been avoided if vaginal breech birth was supported with skilled providers. But many cesareans are avoided on the other hand. Options for what to do are necessary and needed to meet the needs of families and providers in all their variations.

These highly skilled practitioners were received with high regard for their compassionate and vital work. It's inspiring to be in the European academic community and see the high level of collaboration. This conference was a glowing example.


This picture is an hour before start.
I wish I could have shown you lunch!!








After lunch, this middle American middle-aged midwife presented a couple particularly perplexing breech births that became complicated and required on-the-spot innovation of technique. We can learn a formula for breech complication and we must. I highly recommend following the all-fours formula until you have resolved several cases of trapped arms and head. Then you will have in your hands a knowing that allows you to free the stuck breechling in other positions the mother may take. 

I don't believe we as providers should always follow the mother's choice. This is a provocative statement at first, but just explore for a moment what this can mean. In the water pool, the mother can not respond to the baby's head sliding past her pubic bone and clitoral ligament (get why she may move suddenly?) there in the same outlet opening way she can do when free movement is available on her living room floor or a firm hospital bed.  So she remains in an inlet closed position when on all-fours in the tub and you must improvise or get her out of the tub, the baby hanging by the atlas. In one video, I showed how I, similar to Betty-Anne, rotated the baby's head with my finger tips on the temporal bone when the mother remained in the birth tub in such a position that the baby floated out of flexion and lost vitality due to a delay in the birth. I brought the point around to that once you understand the principles and the three levels of the pelvis you can improvise. Then I showed my solution for freeing a small first twin's arm from the symphysis with an external maneuver which I will present in detail this September. 


Follow the formula until the inside of the woman's pelvis and every potential for the stuck breaching is as clear to you as "reaching into your sock drawer at midnight" and you will then be a safer provider when the unexpected happens in less accommodating maternal positions. Meanwhile the esteemed, highly trained professionals seemed a bit shocked and dismayed by the novice in the field. Yet, I showed this for exactly that point, that in North America there is little breech skill and with my small numbers, I am still one of but a handful of the most skilled breech providers in a 500-mile square radius.  I may proceed with duck tape and a prayer, but women have the right and will exercise their rights to vaginal breech birth with or without a skilled provider. One of the reasons is ideology and naiveté, if breech is normal, then why would one need a skilled breech provider? Normal means easy, doesn't it? 

After my own presentation it was lovely to hear Frank Louwen's admonishment that breech is not dangerous. Know the pathology and solve it as it may appear. Then you have the  level of safety that can restore breech skills to the world. But that talk was on Day 2, so wait for it.

Irene De Graaf, MD, PhD, Obstetrician at Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam creatively and humbly collaborated with famous Midwife, Rebekka Visser, Midwifery Practice Springtij, Usquert, in the north of Holland. 


Several Dutch obstetricians spoke with a freshness revealing their personal renewal to considering vaginal breech birth as a potential worth protecting and exploring.

Floorjte Vlemmix, MD, PhD, Resident O & G at Academic Meidcal Cnetre Amsterdam; Lester Befgenhenegouwen MD, PhD Gynaecologist at ZGT Hospitals, Almelo and Hengelo, The Netherlands; and perhaps my favorite presentation was given by Thomas van den Akker, MD, PhD, Resident O&G at University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands. He spoke of the widespread consequence of high resource countries promoting cesarean breech delivery on the maternal and infant death rates in low resource countries when they are not supported in vaginal breech birth and must switch to cesarean surgery in unfavorable conditions.

One slide revealed the rate of future siblings lost to save the first child. Dr. van den Akker shows that for every 10,000 cesareans done for breech position, 26 babies lives will be saved - but in subsequent pregnancies, 27 babies will die from complications relating back to that first cesarean.
Dr. Thomas worked in Malawi, a low resource country, which copies US obstetric protocol of doing cesareans for all breeches, yet in Malawi's compromised conditions. Another slide showed how many of their mothers die from cesarean in high and low resource countries. In Malawi, 6 women die per thousand cesareans done for breech.  Remember, these are comparing cesarean to breech birth on the back, which is not as safe for the child as when the mother is on all-fours and the cord is not cut.

 Having served an American middle class family who lost a mother to cesarean complications, the reality of his data is poignant in my mind.

Like the promotion of bottle feeding where clean water is not available, promoting surgery where electricity and hygiene, blood replacement and medications are scarce is assigning a death sentence to be like the American Jones, but also because the obstetricians with status can't even speak to breech skills for the, in this case, Malawi obstetricians for whom they are mentoring.

The horrendous effects of the ego in medicine are life threatening in as much as they innovate. So how to proceed? The process of the ego in accepting all-fours breech birth is diagramed by Irene De Graaft in the slide above: "No, Never! Impossible!"  to "I don't see any advantages; why is it better?" to "How can I learn/get enough experience?"  to awakening with a question, "What if...?"

An expert panel here moderated by the unflappable Ruth Evers modeled the route to better birth practice for breechlings and their welcoming families and providers. More soon, but now I must get the newsletter out!  



Monday, July 4, 2016

Argentina Breech VBAC

It will be an honor to share my story and inspire others....

We live in Argentina. I would like to share my story to encourage women to try natural breech birth even after 2 C-sections.

I will try to tell you our story with as many details as possible.
We just had our 5th baby with a beautiful breech delivery. I am 32 year old and I have a Unicornuate Uterus.

My first 2 babies were delivered vaginally.

The first one was born in 2002, I got to hospital with 8cm dilation and got the baby out in about 20 minutes, not even having time to get anesthesia. Then I needed to have my placenta removed manually because it was retained. It was born at 37.5 weeks with 2.485kg.

My second was born in 2004, also got to hospital almost fully dilated and delivered both baby and placenta in about 30 minutes. This was at 38.2 weeks with 2.749kg.

My 3rd baby was born in 2007, she was breech, we were thinking to have a breech delivery but my water broke and the cord prolapsed. I was fully dilated and had to do an emergency C-section. This was 37 weeks with 2.756kg.

My 4th was born in 2010. He was also breech. This time my water broke and got to hospital almost fully dilated, but because I wasn’t informed enough I was afraid of trying a breech VBAC. It was at 36 weeks with 2.800kg with no need of neonatological care.
Between 2010 and 2015 I had a miscarriage and a pregnancy trophoblastic disease that got up to 16 weeks.

With my last pregnancy, my baby was also breech, and I really wanted a vaginal birth and I researches that is possible and safe to try according with many recent publication including ACOG and SOGC between many others. My Dr. said during pregnancy that he was willing to assist me, but at 36 weeks pregnancy, he call me and told me he was not going to do it, that it wasn't safe. I think he got scared. I had very hard time finding a Dr. experienced and willing to assist me... 

After a lot of research and Divine help I got to Dr. Guillermo Lodeiro Martinez who was very confident and sure that was safe to try.

At 39 weeks my water broke 7.20 am, I was advised by Dr. Lodeiro to lay in bed for 30 minutes when that happens to avoid cord prolapse. Got to hospital at 8.15 am he was already waiting for me, he checked and I was 6cm dilated and the babies butt was presented, but she was still high.

8.45 am I started having urge to push, he checked again, I was fully dilated. He took me to delivery room. Got there at 9am. I started to push with each contraction to lower the baby while he prepared the bed, he removed the last part of it, in a way that I was seated like a queen position at the border of the bed and he seated in a stool waiting the baby to come out.

My baby was delivered at 9.48 am with 4 pushes, no epidural, no induction, of course, no episiotomy and the doctor didn't even need to touch me or the baby during the delivery. It was a Miracle!

I wanted to share this with you, I tried every exercise in your website, but even [though] they didn't work for me, you encouraged me to try!

Wednesday, June 15, 2016

Making birth balance real with the Montessori Method

My strength is taking knowledge about body work and birth anatomy and turning it into simple and practice methods to help babies start and fulfill birth with the physical power of themselves and their mothers. In other words, I help parents and providers know what to do when to return labor to a normal progression.

I admire people like Marsden Wagner, Rebecca Dekker, Henci Goer and Penny Simkin who take current literature and relate it to current practice.

My talent is more humble, less institutionally trained, and has more to do with visuals. I take what we know on paper and help midwives know it in their hands. The things "we know" are not always common knowledge, sometimes I learned them at a birth and then found them in the literature often ignored because no one realized the importance of taking subtle concepts and illustrating them so that others could understand it. How do I do this? It began with my first teacher.


Maria Montessori 1933
 Maria Montessori was a graduated medical doctor - the first modern Female Doctor in Italy. She overcame great obstacles, like having to dissect cadavers alone after dark with only a candle to light her explorations of the human form. She was not allowed to practice with the boy's club.

A crisis in the municipal housing projects brought her to early childhood education where she inspired the likes of Piaget, whom she turned down to work with her because he was too proud to sit on the floor with children. Instead she choose the janitor's daughter because she came with no miseducated ideas about how children learn.
The Great Educator 1949

Maria Montessori said, "through the hand into the mind." She taught kinesthetically and systematically. She knew more about children because, as she said, The child is the teacher, and she was an excellent, observant student. She noticed how stimulating the world was to the child, many details flooded the child's attention. She simplified each detail into a "lesson" and then let a series of subsequent lessons lead the child spontaneously back to the conclusion of the whole. In her first year with the preschool children, the group of them began to spontaneously read and write because each of the separate details of how to hold a small object, how to sound the letters, to trace a letter, to hold a pen, all cumulated into the whole of writing. The children learned with several steps of success because they didn't have to sit down and learn the entirety in a week or a month.

One way Maria Montessori learned to show child a complex concept was to begin with the the 3-dimensional objects representing the concept. For instance, I'll use the same example I used in making my teaching manual during Montessori training in 1981.

The small child approaches Advent. They have the figurines of a Nativity Scene/ Later they hold a flat object, like a puzzle, of the same scene. Finally, an abstract such as a painting.

This process is a formal version of a more simple and rapid approach in which I show anatomy and concepts for the Spinning Babies premise to experienced birth workers. In this way we can show the reality of gentleness in preparing for and in assisting the natural progression of labor.

Here is a picture of me with Madame Elizabeth Caspari, Maria Montessori's friend and personal secretary.  Together they met in India just as WWII broke out. They spent the next four years in a locked containment camp called a "hill station." Using their time constructively there, they began to develop Montessori in botany, music, math and English language. These are the gifts Madame Caspari brought. She had been a famous children's music teacher in Paris, though she herself was Italian like Madame Montessori. In 1946, Elizabeth Caspari introduced Montessori to America in St. Louis at her first Children's House.

Madame Elizabeth Caspari, 88, with Gail Tully, 20, in 1980

I spent 9 months near her, including the first cycle of Montessori training after which I left for University and plans to become a midwife. I later decided to become a CPM through practical learning and not institutionalized education, though I did get a BS in Family Dynamics. Because I followed Madame Caspari around, often sitting by her feet on the floor, she called me her "little chick."

I can only thank these women and my family tree of teachers, plus an older brother who loved to teach me by Socratic method as to why my workshops win frequent praise and being the best education that many midwives have experienced. Are you a kinesthetic learner? You may like the workshop. Are you an experienced midwife? What you know that is not in the books will be validated and you will feel enthused. That is simply the nature of finding your own.

Wednesday, May 25, 2016

Maternal Positioning isn't the only thing

Gravity first?

The idea of using gravity to swing baby's back around to a pregnant mother's abdomen is a popular hope with a misunderstanding of the cause of challenging fetal positions. It seems that people, even in birth work, think that the baby is floating randomly and settles into position only by virtue of gravity pulling the baby downward. This idea is popular because we look at one variable. Gravity.

I think gravity is only one important variable of maternal position. Others include the state of the mother's anatomy. Are there muscles and ligaments that are too tighten, too twisted, or too loose to do their job?

Specific types of pregnancy body work seem to address these soft tissue structures to the uterus and pelvis quite well. Not just massage but therapeutic pregnancy massage, and skilled myofasical releases, cransiosacral and osteopathic/chiropractic structural care combine for improved fetal position.

Myofascial therapy is a term I use broadly and can be Maya Abdominal Massage, a mother's own activities, often with a helper, Rebozo abdominal sifting, and foam roller work. Homeopathy, Acupuncture and other methods add benefit.

Balance First!
 Once "balance" is restored, then the maternal positions aligning with gravity maintains the space. A baby follows the space to get ready for birth and to move through the pelvis. Developing habits of balance may promote a good fetal position - that's one that in which the baby fits the pelvis.

Then we cycle back to maternal positioning!
In labor when baby needs help to enter the pelvis, pelvic brim opening positions are better than pelvic closing positions!

Posterior Pelvic Tilt
Abdominal Lift and Tuck
External rotation of the femurs
Back extension such as a supported bridge pose or Walcher's

When baby needs to rotate in the mid pelvis,
we start with Sidelying Release and then add
Lunges

When baby needs room to get past
the tuberosities (sits bones) at the bottom of the pelvis
(the nurse gets the first glimpse of the baby's head with her flashlight!)
then we choose positions such as

Anterior Pelvic Tilt
Internal rotation of the femur
Deep squat or low birth stool










The flexed thigh positions explored by Guittier this year in a published article, "Maternal positioning to correct occiput posterior fetal position during the first stage of labour: a randomised controlled trial." BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology.



I commend Guittier's attempt, but was sad that all 6 of the kneeling and forward resting positions chosen had the mother flexing her thighs. This is a comforting pose for labor for sure. But while some muscles are relaxed and gravity helps pull baby off the mother's back, they also constrict the front of the pelvis where the posterior baby needs room to change position. They open the lower pelvis but the baby's rotation is best achieved at the brim. Once the baby is low enough for this position to work, the pushing efforts are either not strong enough for the average posterior baby in this position, or we still need an upright or extended back which this position doesn't allow. Therefore these are really best at comfort positions for the well progressing labor. 

Whoops! 





So maternal positioning can only be the leading action for improving a fetal position when we make useful room in the pelvis. In pregnancy and labor this is by "balancing" muscles, really restoring the balance that the body would have if not for sudden stops during a twist in earth's gravity. In other words, a fender-bender, a fall, a bad posture habit or work or play that twists us a bit while we lift, carry or stop suddenly.

The simple vertical positions of standing and walking help most babies become head down. The key time is second trimester. Expect baby to settle head down in the womb by 28-32 weeks.


Babies fit the space available
For those with less room in the womb, for instance, a septum or single "horned" uterus, having the baby head down as early as 14-20 weeks may be important to avoid a breech presentation.

More common, however, are twists or tensions in the supporting ligaments and muscles to the pelvis and uterus. These can press or pull on the womb and actually reduce the space in the lower uterine segment where baby's head needs the space to settle downwards.



A flash from the past

In labor, many women prefer being upright, and though we can, after giving birth in an upright position imagine that women have preferred this since the beginning of time, it was in
Birth Journal in 1979 that Roberto Caldeyro-Barcia M.D. reported the following:
Birth

Birth

Volume 6,  Issue 1pages 7–15March 1979

 Labor was 36% shorter in primiparous women and 25% shorter in all women who were upright during labor. Maternal position had no effect on fetal head molding or Type I and Type II heart rate patterns. The upright position was preferred by 95% of women.


Birth Journal also reported that squatting shortened the pushing stage in
Golay, J., Vedam, S. and Sorger, L. (1993), The Squatting Position for the Second Stage of labor: Effects on labor and on Maternal and Fetal Well-Being. Birth, 20: 73–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.1993.tb00420.x


Why is it that so few women can really move freely in labor? IV poles, monitoring and beds indicate a passive position in bed, but poles can be pushed and monitors have portable options now. Beds are great for kneeling on and hanging off of... .read more about Forward Leaning Inversion to get that joke.  Why are women still lying down to push babies out?

Safety? The provider is trained to do delivery maneuvers with the mother on her back. Not to mention that all the training for rescue maneuvers (suction, shoulder dystocia maneuvers, unwinding a cord (not often tight so its uncommon that the cord needs unwinding), etc.

But just as we had to learn driving skills in many situations, providers can learn skills for all these situations in a variety of maternal positions. Even epidural medications can be adjusted so that women can "walk" meaning, be on their feet or at least somewhat mobile with a constant companion helping to prevent a fall.

Maternal positioning and solutions for a long or stalled labor are best explained in the Spinning Babies; Parent Class and once you have seen that or a Spinning Babies Workshop, then the Quick Reference download will be a constant companion to the provider of birth care.




Changing the Earth by supporting Birth

Mothers bring forth life; medical corporations do not. Birth can be simple, powerful and loving. Fetal positioning, natural birthing and practical help for normal birth.